This study discusses polygenic, omnigenic and stratagenic models developed to explain multigenic disease risk. It proposes means to test their validity, which has implications for research, drug development and precision medicine.
A key goal of human genetics research is to understand how the effects of genetic variants combine to produce the risk of complex disease. Here we discuss and contrast three conceptual models developed to explain how multigenic risk is generated. The polygenic model, derived from the century-old infinitesimal model, has been the dominant framework for understanding the genetic inheritance of complex traits. More recently, two mechanistic models have been proposed: the omnigenic model, which hypothesizes core genes with direct effects on disease and peripheral genes with regulatory, indirect effects, and what we call the ‘stratagenic’ model, in which the genetic risk of disease is stratified across genomic pathways of functional relevance. There are key differences in the implications of these models for research, drug development and precision medicine. Therefore, it is essential to determine which model is most accurate for each disease or whether a single model is broadly optimal across complex diseases.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Източник: Nature.com
Тази статия е автоматично импортирана от външен източник. За оригиналното съдържание на пълната статия, моля посетете източника.
